Subscribe
Home > Blogs & Communities > Origins > The Prehistory of Cartoons  

A Streetcar Named Darwin | Main | Darwin, Women and Science

July 29, 2009

The Prehistory of Cartoons

Mise en page 1 (Page 28 - 29)

We all loved cartoons as children, and many adults still do. They are funny, and they usually tell a story, either in consecutive panels, as in comic strips, or by using animation techniques, as in motion-picture cartoons. The modern comic strip dates from the late 19th century, when artists such as Rudolph Dirks, inventor of the Katzenjammer Kids, began drawing them for American newspapers; and the animated cartoon was born in 1907, when French artist Émile Cohl began drawing people and other images directly onto movie film.

But a special exhibit in the south of France claims that the origins of the cartoon can be traced back much further, to the earliest known cave art more than 30,000 years ago. The exhibit, at the prehistory center of the Pech-Merle Cave in the Lot Valley, is titled “Préhistoire de la Bande Dessinée et du Dessin Animé” ("Prehistory of the Cartoon Strip and the Motion Picture Cartoon"). It was mounted by prehistorian and filmmaker Marc Azéma of the University of Toulouse in France. Azéma argues in nearly 30 beautifully illustrated panels that early cave artists used some of the same animation techniques that cartoonists use today. And although the exhibit is intended for the general public, it is based on Azéma’s Ph.D. thesis research, which he summarized in a 2005 paper for the International Newsletter On Rock Art, which is edited by French cave art expert Jean Clottes.

Earlier this month, I visited the exhibit and the spectacular Pech-Merle Cave, one of the small number of French painted caves still open to the general public. In panel after panel, Azéma shows how cave artists created the sensation of movement in the animals they drew both by superimposing multiple numbers of legs, heads, and other body parts and by orienting groups of animals in dynamic ways that suggest motion, which is similar to what animators do today. In the Lascaux Cave, for example, some 20 horses were drawn with multiple heads, legs, or tails. One Lascaux horse was drawn with five superimposed heads and several manes. Similar techniques were used at La Marche Cave in France’s Vienne department, where a horse was drawn with so many heads, tails, and backsides that it looks like a blur on the cave wall.

Azéma finds such animation techniques even in the earliest known cave art, at the 32,000-year-old Chauvet Cave in the French Ardèche (see panel above), where a bison is drawn with eight legs. Azéma even suggests that the artist who painted Chauvet’s famous Horse Panel, which features four superbly drawn horses’ heads, might have intended to depict one horse in motion—although he adds that it is not possible to know for sure.

As a special bonus, the exhibit includes cartoon strips drawn by Gilles Tosello, an artist and prehistorian at the University of Toulouse who conducts research at Chauvet. Tosello portrays what he imagines to be the origins of one of Chauvet’s most spectacular artworks, Le Grand Panneau (The Great Panel), which features troops of horses, rhinoceroses, and bison apparently being pursued by lions. In Tosello’s telling, a young woman artist sees the predatory attack from her hiding place in tall grass nearby and then shows her fellow prehistoric humans what she saw by painting the scene on the wall of the cave.

The exhibit continues until 3 November.

—Michael Balter

 

Photo credit: Marc Azéma / Passé simple / le Centre de Préhistoire du Pech-Merle (Lot) / le Musée de Préhistoire d'Orgnac - Grand Site de France (Ardèche)

1 Comments

GRAFFITI ROCK ART -PREHISTORIC – EROTIC ART:

http://www.arterupestre-c.com

As we can see through different images, they had sexual intercourse with animals, homosexual relations and more than two people at the same time.

http://www.arterupestre-c.com/1000.htm

Venus – Venuses

http://www.arterupestre-c.com/1000ven.htm

There is o ne sculpture that is emblematic, found in 1908, after lots of research and different epochs being affirmed as the real o nes about this sculpture, now they believe it was done around 24,000-22,000 BC.

It shows a woman with a large stomach that overhangs but does not hide her pubic area. A roll of fat extends around her middle, joining with large but rather flat buttocks, there’s no face and seems that at this place there is a hat or even hair rolled up o n the head.

Her genital area would appear to have been deliberately emphasized with the labia of the vulva carefully detailed and made clearly visible, perhaps unnaturally so, and as if she had no pubic hair. This, combined with her large breasts and the roundness of her stomach, suggests that the “subject” of the sculpture is female procreativity and nurture and the piece has long been identified as some sort of fertility idol.

The fact that numerous examples like that of a female figure. All generally exhibiting the same essential characteristics – large stomachs and breasts, featureless faces, minuscule or missing feet – have been found over a broad geographical area ranging from France to Siberia. That suggests that some system of shared understanding and perception of a particular type of woman existed during the Paleolithic.


Daniel Sanchez Verdejo

Ciutat Vella - Barcelona - Spain

Leave a comment

Thanks for your feedback. Please keep it polite and to the point.