The push for immigration reform is increasing, and with it, the calls to "staple a green card" to every foreign graduate student's STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) degree in order to boost American innovation. But far from supercharging the nation's scientific and technical creativity, the large influx of STEM students from abroad has had an opposite effect, writes computer science professor and immigration scholar Norman Matloff in a penetrating article essay on Bloomberg View entitled "How Foreign Students Hurt U.S. Innovation."
They do it by glutting the labor market, which lowers wages and encourages many of America's most talented young people to eschew scientific and technical careers and instead use their abilities in other careers.
They do it by glutting the labor market, which lowers wages and encourages many of America's most talented young people to eschew scientific and technical careers and instead use their abilities in other careers.
The interests clamoring for more foreign STEM students and
workers--universities and tech companies--aren't thinking of the
national interest but of their own, suggests Matloff (who, by the way,
is married to a foreign-born scientist). Foreign students are "a profit
center for universities and a wage-suppression tool for the technology
industry," he writes.
Employers have an obvious interest in keeping wages down by increasing the supply of potential workers. Beyond that, public universities hard-hit by budget cuts are especially eager to enroll students who pay high out-of-state tuition. The culmination of this trend, Matloff notes, was the decision by taxpayer-funded California State University, East Bay, to ease its budget woes by accepting only out-of-state and foreign students in its graduate school.
Matloff's hard-hitting analysis of the damaging effects of the nation's STEM labor force policies does not lead him to reject foreign students across the board. "Rather than offering visas and green cards to all foreign students attaining U.S. degrees," he argues, "legislation should focus on facilitating the immigration of top talent." You can read his article here.
Employers have an obvious interest in keeping wages down by increasing the supply of potential workers. Beyond that, public universities hard-hit by budget cuts are especially eager to enroll students who pay high out-of-state tuition. The culmination of this trend, Matloff notes, was the decision by taxpayer-funded California State University, East Bay, to ease its budget woes by accepting only out-of-state and foreign students in its graduate school.
Matloff's hard-hitting analysis of the damaging effects of the nation's STEM labor force policies does not lead him to reject foreign students across the board. "Rather than offering visas and green cards to all foreign students attaining U.S. degrees," he argues, "legislation should focus on facilitating the immigration of top talent." You can read his article here.
