Skip to main content


The Power of Photons, You Say?

A longtime reader sends me word of a new company out in La Jolla, Nativis Pharmaceuticals, whose technology is most certainly eyebrow-raising. I think that the only way that I can do it justice is to quote directly from their web site; I wouldn’t want to get anything wrong:

Nativis has developed and patented a breakthrough technology that captures the unique photon field (signal) of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), or drugs. . .Every drug molecule in a solution is surrounded by a photon field that contains information unique to the molecule. With Nativis’ technology, the photon field, or “drug signal” can be recorded and then replicated for medical treatment. Nativis has proven in preliminary trials that the drug signal – or photonic signature – mimics the original chemical molecule and can unlock the same biological processes as the original to treat diseases, such as brain tumors. With the technology, the drug signal can be reproduced rapidly and flawlessly, each time containing all relevant biochemical information encoded into the new therapeutic signal to drive a biologic reaction. . .

There now, tell me that your eyebrows didn’t get some exercise when you read that. I’m baffled. According to this story from the North County Times, Nativis has investors and advisors who are neither scam artists nor saffron-robed gurus, and unfortunately, the only other appropriate category I can think of is “victim”. Am I wrong?
I say that because there have been ripoffs beyond number that claim to use some sort of strangely energized or structured water, which is what seems to be going on here (see below). Honestly, you could easily fill a 500-page book with them, in fine print, and there are more every day. And if the Nativis folks don’t want to be taken for another member of that crowd, then they should do more to differentiate themselves from the scam artists (and no, linking to videos of Feynman explaining the basics of quantum electrodynamics is not enough). Here’s why I say that – this is the company’s explanation of their process:

MIDS (Molecular Interrogation and Data Systems) captures the photon field surrounding the solvation shell of a molecule in solution.
Captured photons are then imprinted into Coherence Domains in dipole (water-based) solution for delivery to patients; following administration, the photon payload chemically activates a non-water molecule for therapeutic effect.

The questions come tumbling out: what, exactly, is a “photon field”? And how do you capture one? Isn’t a solvation shell a rather dynamic thing, which depends on (among other things) concentration, ionic strength, and pH? How do you imprint captured photons into something? And “Coherence Domains?” That sounds like optical coherence tomography or the like, but only vaguely. How do you imprint into one? And this creates a “photon payload”? How does that, whatever it is, not dissipate?
And that “chemically activates a non-water molecule”, does it? By that, I presume that they mean a drug target. But my understanding of how a drug works on its target is that the drug has to be physically present, because it’s interacting, on an atom-by-atom basis, with said target. Drugs engage in a complex dance of attraction and repulsion with their binding sites (with attraction winning out!), and this process is affected by electron density (charge), hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, and more besides. The drug molecule physically occupies that binding site, which forces the rest of its target into a different shape. And in many cases, it physically displaces water molecules while doing so, and while it’s there, it keeps other molecules from coming in.
I don’t see how a “photon payload” can do these things. If it’s some real assembly of water molecules, I don’t see how it holds together at room temperature. Besides, the water solvation shell of a drug molecule isn’t what comes in and binds to a target; it’s the molecule itself. Shedding those waters is a key energetic part of the whole process. And if it’s not a real, physical assembly of water molecules, then what the heck is it? And here’s another objection: either way, it sound as if they’re taking this “drug signal” while the original drug is out there in solution. But the shape that most drugs have in solution isn’t the one that most drug have when they bind to their targets; adopting that new shape is another key process.
No, I have a weakness for wild ideas, but not this wild. Nativis has a lot to prove: can they take the “drug signal” from a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and kill bacteria with it? Can they use the signal from a receptor agonist and see calcium or cAMP changes in a cell assay? Will the “drug signal” displace a reference compound in a radioligand binding assay? Can you do Michaelis-Menten kinetics with one of an enzyme inhibitor? Will it affect a protein’s NMR spectrum? Can you determine its on- and off-rates in an SPR assay? Can you see a thermodynamic signature in a calorimeter?
And most importantly, will it help anyone who’s sick? Well. . .Nativis says that they’ve shown efficacy in a mouse model of glioblastoma with the “drug signal” of taxol. They say that they hope to file an IND later this year, and to publish more details in the literature within the next few months. I cannot wait. If they really have data sufficient for an IND, then I will enjoy, most thoroughly, being proved wrong. And if this stuff works, we can all take the opportunity to learn some physics while glory, prizes, and huge amounts of money rain down on the Nativis folks, to a backdrop of cheering cancer patients.
I am, as this post shows, intensely skeptical. But these are issues that can be answered, completely answered, by experiment. Bring on the data, guys. I’m sticking with the blog category shown until then.
Update: John Butters, CEO of Nativis, has sent along some more information about his company’s technology. Much of it seems to be based on work by del Giudice and Preparata on the properties of water. Those names rang a faint bell for me – turns out that their work pops up in all sorts of discussions of odd water effects: cold fusion, homeopathy, theories on the origins of life and of consciousness, and so very much on. I must confess that much of the physics is beyond my competence.
However, this all reminds me very much of homeopathy, and of the Benveniste affair and its aftermath, with many phrases (“digital biology”) in common. I have to conclude, for now, that this is what’s going on. In which case, I wish everyone involved – particularly the investors – the best of luck, because I have grave doubts that anything useful will come out of it. I will be delighted and amazed if I am proven wrong.

83 comments on “The Power of Photons, You Say?”

  1. lynn says:

    I think the photon payload acts as a die or mold; it interacts with a non-water molecule (sort of atomic plastic) to create a model of the original drug – which then goes on to interact with the target. This is amazing hogwash! Unless, as you say, it stands up to experiment. Thanks for the morning eyebrow exercise.

  2. Petros says:

    The science behind homeopathy?

  3. steve says:

    Why start with something as complex as taxol? Would the ‘drug signal’ for ethanol get you drunk…? and would you get a hangover?

  4. Jerseylicious says:

    Forget the eyebrow exercise. This concept is new to me. My brain is now tired of trying to imagine how you can target one organic molecule in, literally, a sea of water and biological goo. If those papers do come out, I would love the follow up post and have my skepticism proved wrong too.

  5. Dave says:

    Even IF I bought into the whole photonic field (sounds Star Trekky to me) thing, I read on their website that their Digitax caused no side effects. Surely if it is the photonic field that causes the thereapuetic effect, it is the photonic field that causes toxicity?

  6. Tok says:

    Step right up folks! What we have here is a genuine, one-of-a-kind photon field! Why, with this little gizmo, you can cure most anything! Any ailment, from arthritis to headaches to cancer can be cured without harmful chemicals! I say again, without chemicals! Get yours while the gettin’s good because you know Big Pharma’s going to snap this up right quick and keep it for themselves! Quantities are limited, so get your photon field right now!

  7. Kathryn says:

    Definitely great for facial exercises! The mind doth boggle…

  8. anon says:

    I guess they named themselves Nativis Pharmaceuticals because Naivitis (“naive-itis”) was already taken? At least the investors will get help with their naivete…

  9. Helen says:

    They are saying that the disadvantage of Taxol is it’s ability to cross the blood brain barrier, they are saying their technology overcomes this. By taking their “drug” in a water solution it “is effective in safely crossing the blood-brain barrier” to kill brain cancer…how does that work?!

  10. Photon therapy is a mainstream treatment for conditions as diverse as nearsightedness, neonatal jaundice, seasonal depression, cancer, and disfiguring paleness of the skin. How dare you claim it doesn’t work?

  11. c says:

    Surely there is some quantum superpositioning that can be exploited so that all possible drugs are represented in one ensemble.
    Seriously, this would be funny were it not for the countless diseases which will require nothing short of relentless and expensive disciplined drug development.

  12. sgcox says:

    Most funny part – why do they need to deliver photons orally, intravenously, intraperitoneally and intrathecally and how ?

  13. HelicalZz says:

    Doesn’t everyone include claims on the photonic signature of their molecules when writing out their patents? LOL
    P.S. – I feel deeply for whoever is tasked with the CMC section of their ‘pending’ IND filing.
    P.P.S. sgcox — I think the answer you are looking for is ‘telepathically’.

  14. RB Woodweird says:

    Here at Nativis Pharmaceuticals we have an algorithm which drives our business. Cause we’re super sciency. It is:
    If {(potential investor IQ/100) 1},
    bullshit generator = on
    hype machine = full.

  15. RB Woodweird says:

    Well, that comment didn’t render well at all. Greater than and less than symbols got dropped, and a whole logical clause where the potential investor’s bank account divided by 100000 is over unity was lost, and…
    Hell, it wasn’t that funny. Nevermind.

  16. RandDChemist says:

    What can one do for mental whiplash?
    Maybe Geordi could explain this to me if he wasn’t changing the flux capacitor in the Jeffries Tube.

  17. partial agonist says:

    Remember that program that generates total hogwash research papers, to explore such wonderful concepts as synergistic paradigms of fluxational variance? I think that the makers of that program have branched out into the area of corporate spin for the purpose of raising venture capital.
    Their pitch makes my wife’s shampoo bottle, touting its ability to invigorate and energize your scalp with ionic moisturizing botanicals, seem almost logical.

  18. rick b says:

    Can anyone make sense of their patent, US7081747? They zap a sample with Gaussian noise and read some molecular rotation signal at up to 50kHz. The experimental setup has some fancy electromagnetics, SQUIDs, FFTs, etc.

  19. Cassius says:

    Damn it Jim! I’m a doctor, not a physicist!

  20. J-bone says:

    Maybe they can get Generex to help them with their clinical trials.
    partial agonist, the program you’re talking about is SciGen. Got me through grad school!

  21. Hap says:

    1) “[ampersand]lt” = &lt
    “[ampersand]gt” = &gt
    (I don’t know how to put in the ampersand without HTML interpreting the quoted material.) If you use the standard characters, they get interpreted as delimiters for HTML commands, and ignored if there isn’t one.
    2) Certainly, each molecule has an electrostatic field, and considering that atoms are mostly space, maybe you could replicate that with a field. If that were the case, though, you’d expect the fields to behave like the molecules they emulate. Oh, and how much energy does this take to implement? Most hospitals don’t have nuclear power plants of their own.
    Sounds like some investors are going to have to live with the field effects of their previously held money rather than real cash.

  22. Design Monkey says:

    Ew. The ususal pseudoscience mix of fraud and self delusions. Exact proportions unknown, but that’s not really important, in the end it’s all the same.

  23. weirdo says:

    Comer & Yakatan as scientific advisors. Destined for greatness, this company is, yeeesss.

  24. Curious says:

    Has anybody contacted some of the advisors listed on their website to see if they are 1) real, and 2) genuinely advising the company beyond telling them they are completely loony? I wonder if some of them would be very greatful to be notified their reputation was being trashed in this way.
    Why do I suspect they called these people, asked them some random question, then marked them down as advisors? Oh, because it’s hard to believe any of these people would sign on to such bullshit.
    If it weren’t for that list, they wouldn’t have a shred of credibility, right?

  25. john says:

    “Given the high cost of mistakes, it might appear obvious that a rational organization should want to base its decisions on unbiased odds, rather than on predictions painted in shades of rose. However. . .optimistic self-delusion is a diagnostic indication of mental health and well-being. . .The benefits of unrealistic optimism in increasing persistence in the face of difficulty have been documented. . .”

  26. Harry says:

    Homeopathy with the serial numbers filed off and a bright new coat of cheap paint.

  27. geezer says:

    It seems that John Butters CEO has managed to hoodwink a few Whidbey Isl. investors out of some dough.
    I’m wondering how you get the photon payload out of the fumehood….

  28. John says:

    Derek, you didn’t catch the half of it. These guys have actually been featured on CNBC via the offices of a guy who calls himself an “eco-capitalist”:

  29. CB says:

    The CEO Lisa C Butters apparently has two patents with other members of the Butters family!
    Both patents measuring EM using a SQUID detector with a stocastic excitation/detection scheme between 0-100KHz to look at the EM signature of molecules. Both patents might work but have no utility.
    It appears that the patents only purpose is for buttering up and defrauding investors.

  30. SRC says:

    Yep, and one of the issued patents cites Benveniste. Yow.

  31. Chemjobber says:

    I second Petros — this sounds like homeopathy baloney.

  32. Matt says:

    There is this patent application from John and Bennett Butters (but does not include Lisa Butters).
    61. A method for treating a tumor in a mammalian subject, comprising(a) generating a plurality of low-frequency time-domain signals by the steps of:(i) placing a sample containing a cancer chemotherapeutic the agent in a container having both magnetic and electromagnetic shielding,(ii) injecting noise into the sample at a given noise amplitude;(iii) recording an electromagnetic time-domain signal composed of sample source radiation superimposed on the injected noise, and(iv) repeating steps (ii)-(iii) at each of a plurality of noise levels within a selected noise-level range,(b) analyzing the plurality of time domain signals generated in (a) by producing spectral plots of the time-domain signals, and identifying an optimized agent-specific time-domain signal based on information in said spectral plots, and(c) exposing the subject to the optimized agent-specific time-domain signal identified in (b) by placing the subject within the magnetic field of an electromagnetic transducer, and applying said signal to said transducer at a signal amplitude and for a period sufficient to produce a reduction in the size and/or rate of growth of a tumor in the subject.
    62. The method of claim 61, wherein said agent is taxol or a taxol derivative.
    I suspect Deepak Chopra might be one of the investors. In 1998, he was awarded the Ig Nobel Prize in Physics. The Chopra Center for Wellbeing is in La Costa (San Diego).

  33. Hap says:

    1) The ability to detect an electronic signature of a molecule doesn’t mean that you can actually create that object or its signature somewhere else, nor that it has the effect of the original molecule. Just because I can see a planet in the sky doesn’t mean I can actually create one.
    2) Wiki said that Beneveniste claimed that people trying to replicate his work didn’t get the protocol right. Asssuming that 26 has it right, if you can’t reproduce the results reliably, how can you make a drug from them?
    3) You can’t say that photons don’t have some power – they’re allowing us to give our faces some exercise, and Nativis to show their investors the signature of what used to be their money.

  34. MTK says:

    The really sad part was reading some of the comments from Whidby News. Mostly relatives or victims of cancer enthusiastically wishing Nativis well or saying “Great News!”
    It’s one thing to hoodwink folks with money to spare looking for a big score. It’s another thing entirely to exploit desperate people looking for hope.
    If those involved in this venture sincerely believe they’re on to something, well, good luck. If not, then they should enjoy life now, because they might not enjoy the next one in whatever special place may exist for their ilk.

  35. sigma147 says:

    I assume that in a clinical trial, the successful endpoint would be having the patients go into the light….

  36. the Bard says:

    I hate it when html messes with my prose and “o-apostrophe” becomes something bizarre…
    lets just make it “of”
    Round about the cauldron go
    Into the pot the photons throw
    From Pacific Yew, grown in fog
    Blend with fur from sleeping dog
    The potion shall make a tumor go
    Or allow us all to roll in dough
    Double, double, toil and trouble
    Photon fields for patients bubble
    Thrice add photons from a snake
    In the cauldron boil and bake
    Photons from a toe of frog
    From woolly bat and tongue of dog,
    Burn more incense, make a smoke
    Our investors need a mighty toke
    For a charm of powerful trouble
    Like a hell-broth boil and bubble
    Double, double, toil and trouble
    Photon fields for patients bubble
    Now add a pinch of dragon hair;
    Made fresh in labs of Jim LaClair
    Needs a pinch of piperkadsin C
    Yes, anti-Bredt is fine with me
    Hair of Woodward in the brew
    Put some in from Corey too
    Thicken an hour in the sun
    Then we are ready for phase one
    Double, double, toil and trouble
    Photon fields for patients bubble

  37. Sili says:

    It’s not even original as a kind of woo. Prior art exist as I’m sure Orac’d point out. I seem to recall that it’s also possible to transform homoeopathic remedies to sound and transfer them over the phone.
    True story, as Pat Robertson would say.

    ativis has investors and advisors who are neither scam artists nor saffron-robed gurus, and unfortunately, the only other appropriate category I can think of is “victim”. Am I wrong?

    Yes. Illiterate fucktards are more like it. If one is too stupid to suss out as obvious a scam as this, one deserves to part with one’s money.
    If one does suss it out and still invests, knowing full well that the last sucker is yet to be born, one is all too likely to make a profit.
    Of course I hope that it’s possible to shut the down for fraud, but frankly I doubt it in this deregulated age.

  38. alig says:

    Evidently you are not the only one skeptical. From NCTimes:
    Experts skeptical
    The North County Times gave several quantum electrodynamics experts at universities and national laboratories promotional material from Nativis describing the technology, and the theoretical justification from quantum electrodynamics.
    Peter J. Mohr, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md, expressed moderate skepticism.
    Mohr said by e-mail that while he’s not a drug chemist, “our understanding of photons or radiation emitted by a molecule is that it is unlikely to contain enough information to transmit the therapeutic properties of the source. … Work on quantum computation may eventually change this, but it appears that practical applications are well off in the future.”
    Two experts replied with more strongly skeptical responses, but neither gave permission to be quoted by name.

  39. Sigma says:

    I have a cast-resin copy of an M-16 carbine hanging over my mantlepiece. Everybody thinks it is real. It is painted to have a weathered appearance. Even to the experienced observer, it looks exactly like the real deal.
    Of course, since it is solid plastic, you can’t even pull the trigger. Seems to me a molecule with the same “photon field” as the drug would be as effective fighting disease as my plastic rifle would be fighting Osama Bin Laden. (Less effective, since you could hit Osama over the head with my fake gun.)

  40. JasonP says:

    You know its funny but not so much. It’s BS science like this that makes regular folk who don’t know much about it mistrust science and its results. These guys should be forced to answer some hard questions.

  41. CarlB says:

    If homeopathy works — water retains the active principle of no longer present molecules — how come my survival water filter works? Seems like any water would just endlessly accumulate more and more ghostly characteristics.

  42. Harry says:

    Mildly off-topic. A hilarious takedown of homeopathy:
    I particularly like the part where the nurse questions the dose at 1 part per million, and the doc replies- “You’re right, we need a stronger dose- one part in ten million”.
    What a huge pile of crap.

  43. daen says:

    Could it be the same John Butters as this fellow?
    “John Butters has been working with Plasma Activated Water (PAW) water for some time now and shares it with his clients. He is open to hearing via telephone from anyone consuming PAW who might wish to ask questions or share experiences. There will be no fee for PAW-related telephone consultations.”
    Surely not …

  44. anon the II says:

    I like the poem from the Bard.

  45. Dave says:

    Could it be that they’re trying to produce a “molecular assembler”, akin to a Star Trek “replicator”?
    (I like to keep an open mind, but not so open that my
    brain falls out!).

  46. steve says:

    Derek, you wasted this much of your life and brainpower on this pile of garbage? I read the first sentence of the website and knew it was a pile of steaming rubbish. Case closed.

  47. JC says:

    Spooky medicine at a distance.

  48. sorry says:

    Rumor has it that GSK is currently engaged in due diligence, with a view to acquire Nativis as a follow-up to the Sirtris component of their R&D efforts.

  49. qetzal says:

    Nativis has a lot to prove: can they take the “drug signal” from a fluoroquinolone antibiotic and kill bacteria with it? Can they use the signal from a receptor agonist and see calcium or cAMP changes in a cell assay? Will the “drug signal” displace a reference compound in a radioligand binding assay? Can you do Michaelis-Menten kinetics with one of an enzyme inhibitor? Will it affect a protein’s NMR spectrum? Can you determine its on- and off-rates in an SPR assay? Can you see a thermodynamic signature in a calorimeter?

    I don’t know about any of that, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it can trigger basophil degranulation!

  50. CarlW says:

    Hmmm… if their magic “photon field” technology worked, shouldn’t they be able to replace catalysts in industrial chemistry? Seems like that would be a simpler market to break into (not nearly as many regulatory hurdles).
    (Disclaimer: I am not a chemist.)

  51. Chem undergrad says:

    What a pile of crap! I know it’s been said, but I’ll say it as well: this is just repackaged homeopathy.
    So if the “photon field” is so important, does this mean drugs don’t work if you take them in the dark?

  52. idiotraptor says:

    My understanding (from the company website) is that their technology will create “virtual” drug compounds that, when administered in vivo, will mediate pharmacologic effects without the messy and unwanted side effects of molecular matter-based agents. Note as well this is “green” chemistry; reduced production of and waste from material small molecule compounds.
    Bear in mind Nativis is situated in southern CA which is populated with high net worth, New Age-disposed individuals in whom this sort of bullshit resonates. There may be a cynical rationale to their locating in La Jolla.
    Note that the male CEO/female COO share the same last name. Husband/wife, father/daughter, or sibs?
    Check out the Facebook site for their one science-degreed member of executive management. I like the gravitas it conveys.
    What a stunning example of pseudoscientific drek. The company would do better to post some POC data or relevant references rather than cite the musings of Richard Feymann.

  53. Pataphyzik says:

    These guys will surely appreciate my invention of photon accelerator! Faster photons would make their imprinting process even more efficient. I smell a customer here…

  54. Evorich says:

    So they shined a light of the mouse and it got better?? I don’t understand!?

  55. VertChemist says:

    CarlW: Real, more viable ideas like that often fall prey to the idea that energy is inexpensive. In practice things like ultrasound, microwave and dry grinding have been the next big thing for years already, precisely because the difficulty scaling up such energy-consuming processes, for profit that is. If you think about it, microwaves do produce such a “photon field” that excite some specific rotational mode. Then again, in medicine, that would mean microwaving a brain tumor or something equally high-morbidity.

  56. Be careful says:

    Be very very careful with these guys. It could be that their whole business model is to wait for people to try to de-bunk their “science” then try to sue them.

  57. Hap says:

    you mean, a SLAPP suit? That should work well – I mean, it’s working so well for Generex. If that were their business model, then CA was probably the worst state to start the business in.
    In addition, you have to hope that the SEC doesn’t get involved. Bringing attention to yourself isn’t good for con artists – it usually gets one some manner of beating.

  58. Vader says:

    Petros nailed it. This is homeopathy wrapped in junk physics.
    Electromagnetic field theory is an area I am supposed to know something about. The claim being made by these folks is pure, unadulterated gobbledygook for the purpose of selling snake oil.

  59. SAB says:

    Does anyone know the people on their SAB? Seem like stand-up people – BMS guy, etc. Anyone tried to contact them for comment?

  60. Sillmarillion says:

    Like they say, tilt the USA on it’s side, and everything loose falls into California.

  61. Be careful says:

    So Derek – have you been contacted by any law firms yet??

  62. Evorich says:

    Somebody on this site must live in San Diego. Where is the Nativas site. Can you pay them a visit? Is that possible?

  63. Location says:

    Their address and phone number are easily googled. They are located in a science park across from the torrey pines golf course in La Jolla. It is an expensive area. You can’t see inside on google maps but at least this tells us they aren’t located in someone’s basement.

  64. retread says:

    Now that you’ve all had your fun with photons, how about taking on chiropractic?

  65. JasonP says:

    I could visit the site. What do you want to know? I can take pics heh.

  66. eugene says:

    I’m always impressed by Derek’s willingness to examine all claims in detail in matters such as this and to comment on them in length. Personally, I wouldn’t have the strength and I would just post the press release of the company and let it go at that. I’m sure that Derek is doing a valuable service to someone with the 7 paragraphs that come afterwards.
    This reminds me of Blacklight Power, but more outright crazy.

  67. Evorich says:

    JasonP – maybe just see if the site/labs really exist. Obviously you’re not going to go in there and do a Benveniste-Nature type investigation!

  68. anon says:

    First thought- “what the hell are they smoking?”… followed closely by “can I have some too?”

  69. JasonP says:

    Evorich: Ok, I’ll run up there in an hour. Maybe I’ll take a pic or two with my crappy phone. 🙂

  70. JasonP says:

    Ok I’ll head up there in an hour. Maybe I’ll take a pic or two with my crappy phone. 🙂

  71. exGSK says:

    sounds like the next great buy for GSK – this technology could even make the sirtris compounds work

  72. JasonP says:

    Hey Evorich, check out my post in the new Nativis for my scouting report.

  73. 10kdays says:

    Came across your blog article on Nativis.
    JasonP you’re retarded; if you want to see images of their bldg and lab just watch the freaking CNBC World show. What a dumbass. Do you think they had cameras watching you? You’re photo is probably sitting on an FBI agents desk. What are you a stalker?
    Now for a little intelligence, which seems to be lacking on this so very important blog: :/
    I did a bit of checking myself, which took me all of 5 minutes; they’ve been incorporated for 8 years, changed their name from WavBank to Nativis. They’ve been members of BIO and SoCal BIOCOM for years.
    Hey geniuses, another simple search reveals that Nasa Ames Research and Darpa have been trying to do exactly what Nativis is claiming.
    Maybe it’s all true, maybe not.
    Are any of you scientists? Really, I’m serious.
    Better yet, are any of you employed? Dork!
    Hey Derek, if I was Vertex I would fire your ass and hire someone with half a brain.
    I hear WalMart’s hiring.
    What a piece of shit blog.
    Can one of you come over? I need my car washed.

  74. Edsel says:

    Look, Derek, you got the CEO of Nativis mad at you!
    If Ames has truly considered this crap, we are all in deep trouble…

  75. Nativis says:

    Thank you again for starting the debate on Nativis drug signal therapy. We appreciate your review of our preclinical data and third-party statistical analysis, which we provided you last week. The data speak for themselves. We also appreciate your skepticism and look forward to changing your mind. Many of our science advisory board members had questions early on, but are now fully supportive having seen the statistically significant results of our preclinical testing.
    We understand and agree that peer review journals are one of the most important processes for any new technology. Based on the next series of trial results, Nativis anticipates filing an investigative new drug (IND) application for Digitax with the Food and Drug Administration in fall 2010. The new data will also be the foundation for scientific papers on the Nativis platform, which are planned for submission to peer-reviewed journals in the next six months.
    Looking forward to providing you with this data and discussing our technology with you again soon.
    John Butters, CEO
    Nativis Inc.

  76. Cat Herder says:

    Dude, I *really* hope Nativis goes public! I’ll never have to work again!

  77. chemist at heart says:

    Im all for alternative eastern medical treatment in conjunction with western med. but this sounds like a medical plan that takes money from despite people. Treatments with no drugs just their signature. please….
    Any papers that come out of this will be ones that we all go straight to the lab and try and reproduce

  78. bookemdeno says:

    I am not a blogger as you will quickly tell but the Navitisis condondrum is deserving of at least one trip to the lowlands with you all.
    Considering the technology: Maybe it is somewhere along side of acupuncture/homeopathy, some believe it (as in some who choose to put their money in it) and some do not, as those who may never experience relief from pain through acupuncture.
    What is it based on? Some form of vibration/frequency as suggested by the work Fresh View of Water by Gerald Pollack, University of Washington. Consider terahertz that spectrum that is very small but constantly being radiated by every creature. What if that aura was changed, altered or in the case of disturbance (illness) was mollified my another frequency? Who knows?
    Curious, do you know? What advancement are spending your life on? Apart from the exchange of gossip and innuendo?
    Bright Lights: JasonB and Evorich what noteworthy thing have you come up? I am asking you what concretely have you done in 35 years? And Evorich I am sure you don’t work for money.
    For arguments sake let’s say you are all correct there will be no photon field treatment. Then what about the one idea that comes to fruition because these people chose to try?
    Geezer your concern over the people choosing to invest is noble but what do you really care except to look good on this peer-review blog. Have you ever raised $1 for an idea? Have you ever had an idea worth raising a dollar for?
    Sciencegirl, clearly the scorned woman, a Gemini. It is commendable that you are returning to school after a career in marketing. Maybe the Butters contribution to the cosmos is instigating that in you. Maybe this is all about you, that you are the intended result of all this activity. Hopefully if you can get past the booksmart importance (where Derek has built a fortress) to being truly creative and create something that has never been done before then maybe you will make a big discovery.
    Eugene of course Derek’s position is reasonable, he lacks the fire to be anything more then a class B scientist, something I hope Sciencegirl will avoid.
    Firma, you get it – you are not far from the kingdom.
    I challenge all of you this day to begin thinking of something good that will change our world to something better. Something radical, something new and different because if its not new it will already have been done, you silly ninnies.
    Sciencegirl, We would guess if the curtain of your life was pulled back we could find many things amiss. Perhaps you have received benefit, yet dishonestly tried to keep to yourself? Not crediting those who have contributed to your good fortune.
    As to bankruptcies anyone that knows anything about business knows that the failure of bankruptcy is learning experience not an end but a new beginning. Seasoned VC laud those that have failed and been beaten but refuse to quit. Edison – persistence is 95% of success. Abraham Lincoln was schooled with bankruptcy.
    As to developments in technology, book experts although sincere will most likely be wrong. You all know the famous quote by the head of IBM, early on, who said the world capacity for computers will be some finite number like 100.
    Seastar has it occurred to you that these well heeled investors are doing exactly what they want to do with their money? That perhaps they have a passion that you lack to fund something on the edge of what is important to them. Why don’t you begin working today on the next generation of the electric car battery and leave a proper legacy.
    There is an element in this blog that fails totally in taking into account HOPE, FAITH and God. The recognition that all creative thought comes from God. He is the source for every good invention that man has ever conceived and He will be the origin of many more to come. He created mankind curious, for our benefit. He already knows the secrets he prods us to discover them so that we can do good for each other.
    Alig, It was weak for you to make the Madoff comparison except to look clever before your peers. Madoff’s life work except in the beginning was clearly churning money. In your world view, I am sure every other person is a Madoff , that is anyone who tries to do something that you consider undoable, they are crossing your ethical boundaries. But you don’t believe in God do you? So then, where do you derive your morality?
    John Kingma, You should not have responded in “kind’ that was weak as well my friend. And perhaps a healthy portion of humility would suit you.
    Derek, Bro your response was weak including the misspelling and attaching a PDF was juvenile. Why were you concerned that the people of the blog would believe you? Are you otherwise not believable? You write to show your superiority over mere non-scientist mortals. You write past your mediocrity, lacking the fire and imagination to do something noteworthy with your life.

  79. google says:

    it wont be one of the most thrilling publish ever, but it really is a vital one

  80. The following moment I study a website, I am hoping that it doesnt disappoint me personally just as much as this. I mean, Yes, it has been my own option to examine, but I actually believed you might have got something intriguing to express.

  81. F.A. says:

    One good aspect of pseudosciencebabble: they may serve as materials for (soft) science fiction technobabble. These give me some ideas I could use.

Comments are closed.